<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35584545.post3508794248955518672..comments</id><updated>2011-01-03T23:27:46.844-08:00</updated><category term='environment'/><category term='bay area'/><category term='algorithms'/><category term='software'/><category term='outdoors'/><category term='google'/><title type='text'>Comments on Gregable.: Why do we even need URL Shorteners?</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://gregable.com/feeds/3508794248955518672/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35584545/3508794248955518672/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://gregable.com/2009/05/why-do-we-even-need-url-shorteners.html'/><author><name>Greg</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06692328337754346540</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>3</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35584545.post-5931185134412436147</id><published>2009-05-07T09:16:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-07T09:16:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Your url should be http://gregable.com/long-urls. ...</title><content type='html'>Your url should be http://gregable.com/long-urls. :P (29 chars) Also, what limits CMS's from allowing users to type http://gregable.com/long-urls OR http://gregable.com/2009/05/06/long-urls Both seem like a reasonable url. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As far as url shorteners go, Ugh! They are useful for saving characters, but thats it. Just try to remember that 6 or 7 character hash for any length of time, forget it. Its a horrible UI for people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think there is a good middle ground between short urls and descriptive urls that hasn't been tapped yet.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35584545/3508794248955518672/comments/default/5931185134412436147'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35584545/3508794248955518672/comments/default/5931185134412436147'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://gregable.com/2009/05/why-do-we-even-need-url-shorteners.html?showComment=1241712960000#c5931185134412436147' title=''/><author><name>Patrick Chapman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11769367053403742415</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://gregable.com/2009/05/why-do-we-even-need-url-shorteners.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35584545.post-3508794248955518672' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35584545/posts/default/3508794248955518672' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-768866601'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35584545.post-5841245073189020420</id><published>2009-05-06T22:57:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-06T22:57:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>I agree.  Flickr&amp;#39;s URL structure is pretty nic...</title><content type='html'>I agree.  Flickr&amp;#39;s URL structure is pretty nice too.  The only gripe I would have is their insistence on using www. hostname prefixes.  It&amp;#39;s relatively minor though, and either version works for type-ins.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I disagree with you about dates being all that useful.  They aren&amp;#39;t completely useless, we just disagree on the degree.  Admittedly, there is no perfect answer to the right URL structure - dates are just one tiny example and not a black&amp;amp;white one.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35584545/3508794248955518672/comments/default/5841245073189020420'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35584545/3508794248955518672/comments/default/5841245073189020420'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://gregable.com/2009/05/why-do-we-even-need-url-shorteners.html?showComment=1241675820000#c5841245073189020420' title=''/><author><name>Greg</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06692328337754346540</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://gregable.com/2009/05/why-do-we-even-need-url-shorteners.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35584545.post-3508794248955518672' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35584545/posts/default/3508794248955518672' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1752602699'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35584545.post-7503527999955135649</id><published>2009-05-06T18:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-06T18:25:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Right on, I generally find shorter URLs to be more...</title><content type='html'>Right on, I generally find shorter URLs to be more readable, especially in contrast to some of the URLs generated by CMS systems. For example, even my high school's homepage redirects to something &lt;A HREF="http://www.germantownacademy.net/RelId/605655/ISvars/default/Home.htm" REL="nofollow"&gt;quite scary&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for limiting directory structure to things that users care about, I agree, but think that on a blog, the 2009/05 bit actually falls into the "useful" category. When I'm searching for an old post on my blog, for instance, I often find it easier to hack the YYYY/MM values in the URL to get around instead of clicking on links. It also lets me identify in a search result if a post is old or not. If I see "2004" in the URL and I'm looking for the latest data on browser market share, I know not to click on that link. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another good use of directory structure is found on Flickr. Despite its questionable search features, I can generally get what I want by browsing via the address bar:&lt;br /&gt;Want pictures of cats? flickr.com/photos/tags/cat&lt;br /&gt;Just my cats? flickr.com/wysz/tags/cat</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35584545/3508794248955518672/comments/default/7503527999955135649'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35584545/3508794248955518672/comments/default/7503527999955135649'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://gregable.com/2009/05/why-do-we-even-need-url-shorteners.html?showComment=1241659500000#c7503527999955135649' title=''/><author><name>Michael Wyszomierski</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03640532493501594542</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://gregable.com/2009/05/why-do-we-even-need-url-shorteners.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35584545.post-3508794248955518672' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35584545/posts/default/3508794248955518672' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-621562885'/></entry></feed>
